Iran has countered claims that a significant accord with the United States is nearing completion, emphasizing that while discussions have advanced, major issues remain unresolved. Esmail Baghaei, the spokesperson for Iran’s foreign ministry, highlighted that although there is an understanding on various points, a finalized deal is not yet within reach. He attributed the delay to inconsistent statements from the US and interference from Israel.
The ongoing talks are largely centered on reopening the Strait of Hormuz for commercial shipping. Iran has clarified its stance, indicating no plans to impose tolls on passing vessels. However, it may introduce fees for navigational and environmental protection services in collaboration with Oman. Additionally, Iran has stipulated that any agreement must encompass a ceasefire in Lebanon and the lifting of restrictions on its ports and shipping operations.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has described the negotiations as ongoing and characterized the proposal under consideration as substantial. The framework reportedly includes a 30-day window following a ceasefire, during which Iran would clear mines from the Strait of Hormuz, ensuring unrestricted maritime passage. Meanwhile, the US military has confirmed conducting strikes in southern Iran, targeting missile launch sites and boats allegedly poised to lay mines. The US has framed these actions as self-defense while remaining committed to supporting the ceasefire efforts.
President Donald Trump has remarked that the final deal would be either “great and meaningful” or would not materialize at all. He has also encouraged several Middle Eastern nations to join the Abraham Accords to normalize relations with Israel, though there appears to be limited interest from regional leaders. Another contentious point is Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium. Tehran has shown some willingness to temporarily lower enrichment levels but has dismissed demands to relocate its uranium reserves abroad. Furthermore, Iran is seeking the release of billions of dollars in frozen overseas assets.
Iranian representatives have pointed to political discord within the US, including criticism from Congress and factions of the Republican Party, as factors exerting pressure on the White House and complicating negotiations. The current proposal does not tackle Iran’s ballistic missile program or its backing of regional armed groups, rendering it less comprehensive than previous US demands.